The Constitution of Mexico and The Archaeology of legal revolution

Keywords: Mexican constitutionalism, revolutions, legal archeology

Abstract

This article analyses the legal acts and values that had shaped the constitution of Mexico. The current legal system is analised through a perspective of a number of legal revolutions. Those themes are the main references for this essay, which follows legal revolutions from the 11th century’s Papal Revolution, through the 16th and 17th centuries’ Protestant Revolution and English Revolution, concluding with the American Revolution and the French Revolution of the 18th century. The article proposes that the Mexican constitution was susceptible to ideas from the various legal revolutions, which coexist in Mexican constitution and therefore still influence the current legal system’s rules and solutions, such as the separation of powers, or the so-called writ of amparo, human rights system, and presidential system, which lay ground to the current regime.

References

Arendt, Hannah (2014 [1963]), Sobre la revolución, Madrid: Alianza editorial.
Berman, Harold J. (2003), Law and Revolution, II: The Impact of the Protestant Reformations on the Western Legal Tradition, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.
Césaire, Aimé (1967), Toussaint Louverture. La Revolución francesa y el problema colonial, La Habana: Instituto del Libro.
Cohen, Adam (2016), Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck, New York: Penguin Rndom House LLC, p. 18.
Descartes, René (1952), Rules for the Direction of the Mind, en Great Books of the Western World, vol. 31, Chicago, p. 1.
Foucault, Michel (1973), La verdad y las formas jurídicas, Conferencias pronunciadas en Rio de Janeiro entre 21 y 25 de mayo de 1973, p. 35.
García-Pelayo, Manuel (1991), Obras completes II, Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, pp. 1094-1095.
Hobbes, Thomas (1997 [1681]), A Dialogue Between A Philosopher and A Student of Common Laws of England, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Krzanowski, Andrzej (1991), Chancay: ¿una cultura desconocida?, w Estudios sobre la cultura Chancay, Perú, red. Andrzej Krzanowski, Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński, pp.19-35.
Krzanowski, Andrzej (2008), Kultura Chancay: środkowe wybrzeże Peru u schyłku epoki prekolumbijskiej (X-XVI w.), Kraków y Warszawa: Instytut Amerykanistyki i Studiów Polonijnych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Polskie Towarzystwo Studiów Latynoamerykanistycznych.
Leyser, K. J (1965), “The Polemics of the Papal Revolution”, in Smalley, Beryl (ed.), Trends in Medieval Political Thought, New York: Barnes & Nobel, Inc, p. 53.
Makki, Fouad (2004), “The Empire of Capital and the Remaking of Centre-periphery Relations”, Third World Quarterly 25 (1).
Meyer, Lorenzo (1982) „La Revolución Mexicana y sus elecciones presidenciales: una interpretación (1911-1940)”, Historia Mexicana 32(2).
Parsons, Talcott (1964), “Evolutionary Universals in Society”, American Sociological Review 29 (3): 353.
Reid, Charles J. (2007), “The Rights of Children in Medieval Canon Law”, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-34, Minnesota: University of St. Thomas School of Law.
Tierney, Brian (2008), Religion, law, and the growth of constitutional thought, 1150-1650, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walling, Karl (1995), “Was Alexander Hamilton a Machiavellian Statesman?”. The Review of Politics 57 (3).
Zaret, David (1996), “Petitions and the ‘Invention’ of Public Opinion in the English Revolution”, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 101 (6).
Published
2019-09-24
How to Cite
Czarnecki, L. (2019). The Constitution of Mexico and The Archaeology of legal revolution. Estudios Latinoamericanos, 38, 191-206. https://doi.org/10.36447/Estudios2018.v38.art10
Section
VARIA